McIntosh v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Richard S. McIntosh |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Joyce Conley, Michael K. Nalley, Ronnie Wiley, Blake R. Davis, Sara M. Revell, W. A. Sherrod, Randy J. Davis, Russell Rau, Nelson, Donald Hudson, Harmon, Sproul, Buddy J. Adelsberger, E. A. Stepp, K. Fluck, Gerald Bozman, Marta Santiago and Unit Manager |
| 1:2010cv02506 |
| October 14, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying Motion to Reconsider. Order denying Plaintiff's 19 Motion to Reconsider, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/5/11.(lsw, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that the Amended Complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 3/17/11. (lyg, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/31/11. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff instructed to submit a corrected 1915 Motion, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/12/10. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
