Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 458
Jones v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00860
Petitioner: Ronnie Maurice Jones
Respondent: Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00730
Petitioner: James Romine Johnson
Respondent: Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yauger v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00716
Petitioner: Benny Earl Yauger, Jr
Respondent: Warden Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00343
Petitioner: Robert K. Decker
Respondent: Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BILOUS v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: JUSTAN BILOUS
Defendant: SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, PA JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre' Drew v. Unit Case Manager Murphy, et al
as 24-1116
Plaintiff: ANDRE' DREW
Defendant: UNIT CASE MANAGER MURPHY, INSTRUCTOR SHAW, Drug Education Coordinator, COORDINATOR GAUTHIER, Drug Treatment Program and others
Borowski v. Sproul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00163
Petitioner: Matthew Paul Borowski
Respondent: D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henderson v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner: Emmanuel L. Henderson
Respondent: David Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oscar Marquez v. Daniel Sproul
as 23-3355
Petitioner / Appellant: OSCAR A. MARQUEZ
Respondent / Appellee: DANIEL SPROUL, Warden
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee: MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?