Cases 1 - 10 of 133
BILOUS v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN BILOUS
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, PA JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPROUL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25688
Plaintiff:
JOSH SPROUL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JACKSON v. SPROUL
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
RICKY JACKSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN R SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SPROUL
as 1:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN R SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
LAWSON JR v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAWSON JR
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL, PHOEBE HEALTH CARE, LYNN MONTGEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnnie Jackson v. Kevin Sproul, et al
as 22-13577
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN SPROUL, CARLA WATSON, PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. and others
CROSBY v. SPROUL
as 1:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
JAMES L CROSBY
Respondent:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPROUL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16425
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ANTHONY SPROUL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CROSBY v. SPROUL
as 1:2022cv00124
Petitioner:
JAMES L CROSBY
Respondent:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
