JOHNSON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
| PAMELA JOHNSON |
| DOUGHERTY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DOUGHERTY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, KEVIN SPROUL, TERRON HAYES, JOHN OSTRANDER, SHIRLEY ADAMS and LAURA GILBERT |
| 1:2023cv00060 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by PAMELA JOHNSON as to DOUGHERTY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. (KING, MAURICE) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to KEVIN SPROUL. (dht) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to JOHN OSTRANDER. (dht) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to TERRON HAYES. (dht) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to LAURA GILBERT. (dht) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DOUGHERTY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. (dht) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SHIRLEY ADAMS. (dht) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to DOUGHERTY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. (dht) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4347507, $402 filed by PAMELA JOHNSON (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit CHARGE OF DISCRIMINATION, #3 Exhibit NOTICE OF RIGHTS TO SUE LETTER)(KING, MAURICE) Modified on 4/17/2023 to update docket text(dht). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
