Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Annamalai v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Annamalia Annamalai
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USA, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Jr. v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv10995
Defendant:
Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen, Michigan State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Andrew Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jennifer v. Nichols et al ALL ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE ON 18-CV-12634
as 3:2019cv10990
Defendant:
Shawn Kotch, William McMullen, Michigan State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Smith Jennifer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zureki v. Nichols et al ALL ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE ON 18-CV-12634
as 2:2019cv10984
Defendant:
Monroe County Circuit Court, Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Zureki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
