Watts v. Zavaras et al
| David Watts |
| Aristedes Zavaras, Kevin Milyard, Don Morton and Soares |
| 1:2010cv02956 |
| December 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that the amended habeas corpus application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is denied, and the action dismissed. FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 2/17/11. (lyg, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 16 Motion to Reconsider. ORDERED that the emergency motion to reconsider that Plaintiff, David Watts, filed pro se with the Court on 1/28/11, is denied to the extent Mr. Watts seeks reconsideration of the 1/12/11, order denying his mo tion for preliminary injunction. FURTHER ORDERED that the 1/28/11, emergency motion is denied to the extent Mr. Watts seeks injunctive relief based upon the 1/10/11, incident. Mr. Watts continues to have 30 days from the date of the 1/13/11, order in which to file an amended application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 2/15/11.(lyg, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 01/11/11.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/10/10. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
