Everett v. Timme et al
Elon Edward Everett |
Rae Timme and John W. Suthers |
1:2011cv01238 |
May 10, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Fremont |
Wiley Y. Daniel |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER Denying Petition for Habeas Corpus. Ordered that the Application for a Writ Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1; May 10, 2011) is denied with prejudice. ORDERED that a certificate of appealability shall not issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/31/11. (jjh, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER for State Court Record. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of the complete record of Applicants state court proceedings in People v. Elon Edward Everett, Arapahoe County District Court Case No. 05CR3213. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this order to the clerk of the state court from which the case originated and to the Court Services Manager, State Court Administrators Office by United States mail by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 07/07/11. (jjh, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/17/2011. (sah2, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.