Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Faircloth v. Timme, et al
as 16-1170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FAIRCLOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN RAE TIMME, in her official and individual capacity, GARY MORGAN, Mental Health Clinician/Designee, in his official and individual capacity, BERNES, Chief Mental Health Clinician/Designee, in her official and individual capacity and others
Peterson v. Timme, et al
as 15-1086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE EDWARD PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RAE TIMME, F.C.F. Warden, JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER CO., ET AL., and others
Peterson v. Timme et al
as 1:2015cv00216
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edward Peterson
Defendant:
Rae Timme, John Suthers, City and County of Denver CO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bueno v. Timme, et al
as 14-1245
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOEY BUENO
Respondent - Appellee:
RAE TIMME and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Hoeck v. Timme, et al
as 14-1229
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID B. HOECK
Respondent - Appellee:
RAE TIMME, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Bueno v. Timme et al
as 1:2013cv03401
Petitioner:
Joey Bueno
Respondent:
Rae Timme and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2013cv03002
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Allen
Defendant:
Executive Director of CDOC, Rae Timme, Fredric Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigil v. Executive Director et al
as 1:2013cv02679
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vigil
Defendant:
Executive Director, Rae Timme, Fredric Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoeck v. Timme et al
as 1:2013cv02575
Petitioner:
David B. Hoeck
Respondent:
Rae Timme and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2013cv02236
Plaintiff:
John A. Ramirez
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Rae Timme, Fredric Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
