Quintero v. Astrue
| Cynthia Quintero |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2012cv01849 |
| July 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Pueblo |
| John L. Kane |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 44 Motion for Attorney Fees by Judge William J. Martinez on 04/19/2016.(cthom, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 32 Motion for Attorney Fees. By Judge William J. Martinez on 3/24/2015.(alowe)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER re: 27 USCA Order/Opinion/Judgment, 28 USCA Mandate, Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Final Judgment ECF No. 19 is hereby VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with the Tenth Circuits decision. The Clerk shall enter judgment against the Commissioner and in favor of Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall have her costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/5/2014. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER AFFIRMING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S DECISION, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/2/2013. (wjmcd, ) (Main Document 18 replaced on 8/2/2013) (wjmcd, ).
|
|
Filing
11
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 1/21/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 2/20/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 3/7/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 12/12/12. (sgrim)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
