Hernandez v. Astrue
| Michael J. Astrue |
| Steven J. Hernandez |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2012cv01865 |
| July 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| John L. Kane |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 34 Motion for Attorney Fees. ORDERED that the Defendant pay to Plaintiff, through counsel, reasonable attorney fees in the amount of $4,635.65 by Judge John L. Kane on 06/26/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
31
JUDGMENT in favor of Steven J. Hernandez against Michael J. Astrue (Carolyn Colvin), by Clerk on 5/14/2014. (trlee, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand. The Court hereby REMANDS this matter to the Social Security Administration for the consideration of additional evidence in accordance with the sixth sentence of Social Security Act § 205(g), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006). By Judge John L. Kane on 11/4/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
16
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 8/27/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 9/26/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 10/11/2013. By Judge John L. Kane on 6/26/13. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER denying 10 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall answer as soon as practicable, and counsel shall confer regarding their Joint Case Management Plan, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/6/13.(sgrim)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
