Thomas v. Timme et al
| Mack Thomas |
| Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Rae Timme |
| 1:2013cv01378 |
| May 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk, re: 18 Order. By Clerk on 10/10/13. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Mack Thomas, is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. No certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. In forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of appeal. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, see Coppedge v. United States, 369 U .S. 438 (1962). If Applicant files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24., by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/8/2013. (ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Mack Thomas, it is ORDERED that claim one and three of the § 2254 Application are DISMISSED as barred by the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Claim three is dismissed on the additional ground that it fails to raise a federal issue cognizable on federal habeas review. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days, Respondent(s) shall file an Answer in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases that fully addresses the merits of exhausted claim 2 of the Application. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the filing of the answer Applicant may file a reply, if he desires, by Judge William J. Martinez on 7/22/2013. (ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/12/2013. (skl)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER To File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/29/13. (nmmsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
