Sanchez v. Booth et al
Feliberto Sanchez |
Dave Booth, Robin Burkett, Timmarie D. Ballard and Werth |
1:2014cv02113 |
July 30, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Logan |
Boyd N. Boland |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER adopting 24 Report and Recommendations, granting 16 Defendant Werth's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, and dismissing 8 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint in its entirety. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/28/2015. (cpear) |
Filing 23 ORDER denying 21 "Motion to Appeal Courts illegal and Wrongful Decision Under 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202 And under rule 65 Fed. R. Crim. P." by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/30/15.(dkals, ) |
Filing 20 ORDER denying 18 Motion for Recusal. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/22/2014.(tscha, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER denying 13 Motion to correct corrupt (illegal) ruling, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/10/2014.(tscha, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw in Part by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/9/14. Defendants Tammarie D Ballard and David Booth are dismissed, and Plaintiff's request for appointed counsel 7 is denied. (dkals, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/28/14. (morti, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/07/2014. (slibi, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.