Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Werth v. J P Morgan Chase Bank N A
as 6:2025cv02088
Plaintiff:
Barbara Werth
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase Bank N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Coleman v. First National Bank of America et al
as 1:2025cv06775
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Coleman
Defendant:
First National Bank of America, Dan Bitzer and David Werth
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Christian and Jewish Alliance Inc. et al v. Brunner et al
as 3:2025cv02992
Plaintiff:
Christian and Jewish Alliance Inc., Ezra Ministries a California not-forprofit religious corporation doing business as The Mission Church and Ruth Mastron
Defendant:
Daniel Brunner, Aimee Magda Werth, Kristina Turner-Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Werth v. Bisignano
as 0:2025cv03784
Plaintiff:
Sherri Ann Werth
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bonjorno v. Rush County, Kansas et al
as 6:2025cv01163
Plaintiff:
Tyce A. Bonjorno
Defendant:
Rush County, Kansas, Bruce Gatterman, John Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tiffany Wheatley, et al v. Boardman Township, OH, et al
as 25-3526
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY D. WHEATLEY
Defendant:
BOARDMAN TOWNSHIP, OH, MAHONING COUNTY COURT NO. 2, JUDGE JOSEPH M. HOUSER, in his official individual capacity and others
Intervenor:
AUBRIELLEN WHEATLEY
Werth v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00511
Plaintiff:
Jamie Werth
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Puller, et al v. Greco, et al
as 25-1028
Plaintiff:
TREVOR PULLER and DEANDRE HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
NICHOLAS GRECO and NICODEMUS WERTH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
