Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Puller et al v. Simmons et al
as 1:2023cv00843
Plaintiff:
Trevon Puller and Deandre Hutchinson
Defendant:
Jason Simmons, Nicholas Greco and Nicodemus Werth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Werth et al v. Timman
as 2:2022cv14082
Plaintiff:
Rebekah Werth and H.C.
Defendant:
Carolyn Timman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Werth v. City of Stuart Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv14261
Defendant:
City of Stuart Police Department, Richard Shine and Matt Cernoto
Plaintiff:
H.C. and Rebekah Werth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Boardman Township et al
as 4:2021cv00838
Defendant:
Boardman Township, Thomas Costello, Speedway and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Speedway, LLC
Plaintiff:
Dominique King
3Rd Party Defendant:
Off Duty Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Marks v. Boardman Twp Police Dept et al
as 4:2020cv00431
Plaintiff:
Craig Marks
Defendant:
Deputy Brady Mullholland, Officer Dan Jones, Officer Dan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Werthe et al v. Hopewell Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00090
Defendant:
John Altman, Jr., Sandra R. Robinson, Heike Polumbo and others
Plaintiff:
Wade Werthe and Jean Werthe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Werth et al
as 4:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Boardman Township, Ohio, Todd Werth, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-2020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Werthe et al v. Dinwiddie Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
Wade Werthe and Jean Werthe
Defendant:
Dinwiddie Sheriff's Office, T. B. Moore, R. Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
