Weishoff v. Arnold et al
Angela Weishoff |
Michael Arnold, C&D Enterprises, Inc, David C. Walcher, Michael (I) Arnold and David (I) C. Walcher |
1:2014cv02608 |
September 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Wiley Y. Daniel |
Craig B. Shaffer |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER re: 43 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of the remaining claims in the present case. It is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice ECF Doc. No. 43 , filed November 20, 2015, is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that this matter, in its entirety, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs. by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/20/2015. (evana, ) |
Filing 42 ORDER re: 41 Stipulation of Dismissal of Case filed by C&D Enterprises, Inc., is APPROVED. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own costs, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/21/2015. (evana, ) |
Filing 37 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 the Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings. The motion is denied to the extent it requests a stay of the proceedings. The motion is granted in that this case will be administratively closed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 with leave to be reopened for good cause shown. In furtherance of the administrative closure, the parties are ordered to either submit dismissal documents or a joint status report with the Court not later than Monday, August 2 4, 2015. Based upon the parties filing, the Court will determine the appropriate course of action. It is FURTHER ORDERED that in light of the administrative closure of this matter, the Defendants motions to dismiss ECF No. 21 and ECF No. 22 are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/2/2015.(evana, ) |
Filing 31 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 1/23/15. ORDERED that when filing restricted documents, parties MUST fully comply with the requirements of D.C.ColoL.CivR. 7.2. (cbssec) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.