Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CALES v. ALLIED UNIVERSAL et al
as 2:2023cv04673
Plaintiff:
JASBIRIE CALES
Defendant:
ALLIED UNIVERSAL, C&D ENTERPRISES, INC., C&D SECURITY MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
JONES v. C&D SECURITY MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
EZRA JONES
Defendant:
C&D SECURITY MANAGEMENT, INC. doing business as ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, C&D ENTERPRISES, INC. doing business as ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY, UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, LLC doing business as ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCray v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02270
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Universal Protection Service, LLC d/b/a Allied Universal Security Services, C & D Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Allied Universal Security Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Becky McCray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02183
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Weishoff v. Arnold et al
as 1:2014cv02608
Plaintiff:
Angela Weishoff
Defendant:
Michael Arnold, C&D Enterprises, Inc, David C. Walcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NESMITH v. C & D ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 2:2014cv01555
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN NESMITH
Defendant:
C & D ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
