Chrisco v. Raemisch et al
| Luke Irvin Chrisco |
| Richard F. Raemisch, Gallardo, Krakow, Espinoza, Richard Maley, Donald Gibson, Spearing, Barr, Lynn Edward Travis, Ulysses Montoya, Eslinger, Cortez, Collins, Sierra, Keys, Pamela Jones and Shoffler |
| 1:2017cv01036 |
| April 26, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Pueblo |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
191
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/13/2020. ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 189] is ACCEPTED in part and REJECTED in part. ORDERED that this case is administratively closed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, subject to being reopened for good cause shown. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/18/2019, re: ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection to (ECF 113) Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Regarding Defendant Gibson's Motion to Dismess 114 is SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part as stated in this order; ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 113 is ACCEPTED in part and REJECTED in part as stated in this order; 104 defendant Gibson's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
126
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 115 Stipulated Motion for an Administrative Stay Toward a Settlement Between the Parties. ORDERED by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/5/2019. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
113
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/17/18 re 104 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Donald Gibson. The Court respectfully recommends that 104 Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 06/12/2018, re: 107 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 03/27/2018, re: 32 defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED ; 94 the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that plaintiff's first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and eighth claims for relief are dismissed to the extent that they assert constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ORDERED that plaintiff's ninth, tenth, eleventh, thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth, sixtee nth, and seventeenth claims for relief are dismissed. ORDERED that plaintiff's seventh claim for relief is dismissed to the extent that it asserts an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Jones. ORDERED that plaintiff's twe lfth claim for relief is dismissed to the extent that it asserts an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Raemisch. ORDERED that the following claims will proceed: plaintiff's first claim for relief to the extent that it asserts a med ical malpractice claim against defendant Krakow; plaintiff's second claim for relief to the extent that it asserts a medical malpractice claim against defendants Maley, Gibson, and Spearing; plaintiff's seventh claim for relief to the extent that it asserts an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Keys plaintiff's twelfth claim for relief to the extent that it asserts a Fourteenth Amendment claim against defendant Raemisch. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
94
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 32 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sierra, Krakow, Ulysses Montoya, Spearing, Eslinger, Espinoza, Richard F. Raemisch, Shoffler, Collins, Cortez, Lynn Edward Travis, Pamela Jones, Gallardo, Richard Maley by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/20/2018. The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that Defendants Motion to Dismiss [filed July 31, 2017; docket #32] the Complaint be GRANTED. (mdave, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
