Cases 1 - 10 of 100
William White v. Seminole County Sheriff, et al
as 26-11213
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant:
SEMINOLE COUNTY SHERIFF, RONALD SHAW, JOSEPH KLINGER and others
Eslinger v. Sons of Silence et al
as 3:2026cv03091
Plaintiff:
Angela Eslinger
Defendant:
Sons of Silence, USA, Ernie Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Eslinger v. Sons of Silence et al
as 3:2026cv00273
Plaintiff:
Angela Eslinger
Defendant:
Sons of Silence, USA, Ernie Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Eslinger v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2026cv00001
Plaintiff:
William Eslinger
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Melisha Jones et al v. Whaleco, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv04677
Plaintiff:
Melisha Jones, Raeshall Mayo, Ronald Hauge and others
Defendant:
PDD Holdings, Inc., Whaleco, Inc. doing business as Temu, Pinduodou Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Eslinger v. Harding
as 6:2025cv00042
Petitioner:
Rocky J. Eslinger
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eslinger v. CareSource
as 1:2023cv12571
Plaintiff:
Patsie Eslinger
Defendant:
Caresource
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Eslinger v. CareSource
as OHS/3:23-CV-00271
Plaintiff:
Eslinger and Patsie Eslinger
Defendant:
CareSource
Eslinger v. CareSource
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Patsie Eslinger
Defendant:
CareSource
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv16234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
