Dawson v. Lengerich et al
Plaintiff: James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Defendant: Jason Lengerich, Coleman, David Lisac, Ronald Armstrong, Gerry Bland, Tresch and Anthony DeCesaro
Case Number: 1:2018cv01112
Filed: May 9, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Chaffee
Presiding Judge: Gordon P. Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER. The Court ORDERS that: The 112 December 10, 2021, Order is VACATED. Plaintiff has twenty-one days from the date of this Order to file a Response to Defendants' 90 Motion in Limine. Defendants' shall have fourteen days from the Response to file a Reply. Plaintiff's 114 Objection regarding the Motion in Limine is OVERRULED AS MOOT. The Court further ORDERS that, given the staleness of the Final Pretrial Order that was entered in this case more than two years ago a nd at a time when Plaintiff was proceeding pro se, the parties are directed to contact the chambers of United States Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews to set this matter for a new Final Pretrial Conference ahead of the scheduled Trial Preparation Conference. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/13/2022.(sdunb, )
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 111 APPOINTMENT ORDER. Plaintiff's 108 Motion is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that the Clerk shall select, notify, and appoint counsel to represent Plaintiff in this civil matter, including by seeking the assistance of the Pro Bono Mediation Pan el. Plaintiff is advised that the Clerk will select counsel from the Panel; however, there is no guarantee that Panel members will undertake representation in every case selected as part of the Pilot Program. The Court cautions that Plaintiff is responsible for all scheduled matters, including hearings, depositions, motions, and trial. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/09/2021.(sdunb, )
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER. The Court ORDERS the four-day jury trial set to commence on August 23, 2021 is hereby VACATED. The Trial Preparation Conference set for July 30, 2021 is also VACATED. Defendants' Motion (ECF No. 85 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Counsel are directed to contact the Court's Judicial Assistant via email (Deanne_bader@cod.uscourts.gov), on or before the close of business on August 2, 2021 to obtain new trial dates. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/26/2021.(trvo, )
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 58 OPINION and ORDER by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/30/2020, re: 53 Motion for Leave to Restrict is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth herein; 57 Mr. Dawson's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply is DENIED AS MOOT . Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 49 is DENIED on the terms set forth above. Claim One alleging an Eighth Amendment deprivation against Mr. Coleman, Mr. Lisac, and Mr. Tresch will proceed to trial. The parties shall promptly begin preparation of a Proposed Pretrial Order and shall jointly contact chambers to schedule a Pretrial Conference. (sphil, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dawson v. Lengerich et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Lengerich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Lisac
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gerry Bland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tresch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony DeCesaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?