Koch v. ADX et al
| Michael William Koch and M. W. Koch |
| True and ADX |
| 1:2020cv02662 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 INMATE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Michael William Koch. (apesa, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. That the Clerk of Court is directed to file the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. #1 ), Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #2 ), and Motion to Join Actions (ECF No. #3 ) in Case No. 20-cv-01844-GPG. That the Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. That all pending motions are denied as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/2/2020. (evana, )
|
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Join Actions by Plaintiff Michael William Koch. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Michael William Koch. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against ADX, True, filed by Michael William Koch.(trvo, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
