Cases 1 - 10 of 100
York v. Warden, ADX Florence et al
as 1:2026cv02873
Plaintiff:
Dwight D York
Defendant:
Warden, ADX Florence, Associate Warden, ADX Florence, SIS Tech Kerri Lewis-Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crosby (PS) v. Warden ADX et al
as 1:2026cv02202
Petitioner:
Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D Cosby
Respondent:
Warden ADX, Kevin Troutman, Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Waters v. Baysore, et al
as 26-1092
Petitioner:
THOMAS WATERS
Respondent:
BAYSORE, ADX Warden and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Crump v. Central Office, et al
as 26-1088
Plaintiff:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Defendant:
CENTRAL OFFICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE, ADMINISTRATIVE MAXIMUM and others
Crosby v. Baysore, et al
as 26-1081
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. CROSBY
Respondent:
D. BAYSORE, Warden ADX Complex and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON
Crump v. Connors, et al
as 26-1041
Plaintiff:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICES, Supervised release, NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Williams (PS) v. ADX Warden et al
as 1:2026cv00427
Plaintiff:
Barry Williams
Defendant:
ADX Warden, Jessica Toelle, ADX Unit Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Baysore, et al
as 26-1033
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. CROSBY
Respondent:
D. BAYSORE, Warden ADX Complex and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON
Crump v. Central Office, et al
as 26-1034
Plaintiff:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Defendant:
CENTRAL OFFICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE, ADMINISTRATIVE MAXIMUM and others
Crosby (PS) v. Warden ADX et al
as 1:2026cv00104
Petitioner:
Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent:
Warden ADX and North Central Region
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
