Hill v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Petitioner: David Hill
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. True, Harley Lappin and BOP
Case Number: 1:2020cv02830
Filed: September 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2020 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM of Law In Support re #11 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner David Hill. (sphil, )
November 2, 2020 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM of Law In Support to #11 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (sphil, )
October 26, 2020 Filing 12 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action, by Petitioner David Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sphil, )
October 26, 2020 Filing 11 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241, filed by David Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sphil, )
October 21, 2020 Filing 10 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by David Hill.(evana, )
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that the Second Order to Cure Deficiencies (ECF No. #7 ) is VACATED. It is FURTHER ORDERED the tendered amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (ECF No. #5 ) shall be filed this date. That the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #6 ) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, within 21 days from the date of this Order, Mr. Hill shall notify the Court if he wishes to withdraw his request for voluntary dismissal of this action, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/21/2020.(evana, )
October 19, 2020 Filing 8 Letter re: MOTION to Dismiss This Matter by Petitioner David Hill. (sphil, )
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 VACATED Second ORDER Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies. If Petitioner fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. ORDERED that the "Motion for Leave to Amend 28 U.S.C. 2241 Petition" (ECF No. 4) is DENIED, and the tendered amended Application (ECF No. 5) is rejected for failure to comply with the Courts September 21 Order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/8/2020.(sphil, ) (Modified on 10/21/2020 VACATED pursuant to the #9 Order)(evana, ).
October 8, 2020 Filing 6 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action, by Petitioner David Hill. (sphil, )
October 5, 2020 Filing 5 Tendered APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241, filed by David Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sphil, )
October 5, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify by Petitioner David Hill. (sphil, ) (Main Document 4 corrected on 10/8/2020) (sphil, ). Modified on 10/8/2020 to show the correct attached document. (sphil, ).
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies. If Petitioner fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to Mr. Hill, together with a copy of this order, a Prisoner Complaint and a Prisoners Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 along with the applicable instructions, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/21/2020. (forms mailed as ordered). (sphil, )
September 16, 2020 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (alave, )
September 16, 2020 Filing 1 Petition for Relief Under 28 USC 2241, filed by David Hill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(alave, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: B. True
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harley Lappin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BOP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?