Schultz v. Long et al
Petitioner: Lucos Schultz
Respondent: Long and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Case Number: 1:2021cv01206
Filed: April 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2021 Filing 9 RESPONSE to #5 Order,, by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, LongAttorney Christine C. Brady added to party Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The(pty:res), Attorney Christine C. Brady added to party Long(pty:res). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Brady, Christine)
May 7, 2021 Filing 8 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of the #5 Order to File Preliminary Response and #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Respondent Long. (athom, )
May 7, 2021 Filing 7 Acknowledgment RECEIPT by Respondent Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The re: #6 Certificate of Service. (athom, )
May 7, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and #5 Order to File Pre-Answer Response for Service of Process. (rvill, )
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. Within twenty-one days from the date of this Order the Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response that complies with this Order. Within twenty-one days of the Respondents filing the Pre-Answer Response, Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. If Respondents do not intend to raise either of the affirmative defenses of timeliness or exhaustion of state court remedies, or raise procedural default issues, or otherwise, Respondents must notify the Court of that decision in the Pre-Answer Response. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 05/06/2021. (athom, )
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 05/06/2021. (athom, )
April 30, 2021 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, )
April 30, 2021 Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action by Petitioner Lucos Schultz. (trvo, )
April 30, 2021 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Lucos Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(trvo, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schultz v. Long et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lucos Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Long
Represented By: Christine C. Brady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Represented By: Christine C. Brady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?