Ardrey v. City of Florence, The et al
Plaintiff: Shalone Ardrey
Defendant: City of Florence, The and Michael Patterson
Case Number: 1:2022cv00318
Filed: February 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: William J Martinez
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sh - Fed. Question - Sexual Harrassment
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2022 Filing 28 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance for Plaintiff by Paul Forrest Lewis on behalf of Shalone ArdreyAttorney Paul Forrest Lewis added to party Shalone Ardrey(pty:pla) (Lewis, Paul)
April 5, 2022 Filing 27 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Shalone Ardrey. (Swan, Andrew)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MINUTE ORDER: The Motion for Leave to Withdraw Appearance of Hannah E. Herbst #24 is GRANTED. Attorney Hannah Elizabeth Herbst is hereby terminated as counsel of record for Plaintiff Shalone Ardrey. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/30/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, )
March 29, 2022 Filing 25 MEMORANDUM regarding #24 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for Plaintiff filed by Shalone Ardrey. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/29/2022. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
March 29, 2022 Filing 24 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for Plaintiff by Plaintiff Shalone Ardrey. (Herbst, Hannah)
March 21, 2022 Filing 23 DEFENDANT MICHAEL PATTERSON'S ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Michael Patterson.(Powers, Alice)
March 21, 2022 Filing 22 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by City of Florence, The.(Cook, Sara)
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTE ORDER: Defendant the City of Florence's ("Defendant") Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Complaint #19 is hereby GRANTED. Defendant's response to the Complaint is due 3/21/2022. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/15/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, )
March 14, 2022 Filing 20 MEMORANDUM regarding #19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond (Second) filed by City of Florence, The. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/14/2022. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
March 14, 2022 Filing 19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond (Second) by Defendant City of Florence, The. (Cook, Sara)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER: The court CONSTRUES Defendant Michael Patterson's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #14 and Defendant the City of Florence's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Complaint #16 together as a STIPULATION for extension of time pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(a), which provides that "[t]he parties may stipulate in writing to one extension of not more than 21 days beyond the time limits prescribed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to respond to a pleading or amended pleading, interrogatories, requests for production of documents, or requests for admissions." Accordingly, Defendant Michael Patterson's response to the Complaint is due 3/21/2022 and Defendant the City of Florence's response to the Complaint is due 3/14/2022. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/25/2022. Text Only Entry(nywlc3, )
February 25, 2022 Filing 17 MEMORANDUM regarding #14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Michael Patterson, #16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by City of Florence, The. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/25/2022. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
February 24, 2022 Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant City of Florence, The. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Cook, Sara)
February 24, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Sara Ludke Cook on behalf of City of Florence, TheAttorney Sara Ludke Cook added to party City of Florence, The(pty:dft) (Cook, Sara)
February 24, 2022 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Michael Patterson. (Powers, Alice)
February 24, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Alice Conway Powers by Alice Conway Powers on behalf of Michael PattersonAttorney Alice Conway Powers added to party Michael Patterson(pty:dft) (Powers, Alice)
February 10, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael Dickson Kuhn on behalf of Shalone ArdreyAttorney Michael Dickson Kuhn added to party Shalone Ardrey(pty:pla) (Kuhn, Michael)
February 10, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Hannah Elizabeth Herbst on behalf of Shalone ArdreyAttorney Hannah Elizabeth Herbst added to party Shalone Ardrey(pty:pla) (Herbst, Hannah)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/09/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 4/18/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 4/25/2022 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, via telephone conference. All participants shall use the following dial-in information: 888-363-4749, Access Code: 5738976#. (alave, )
February 8, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shalone Ardrey. City of Florence, The served on 2/7/2022, answer due 2/28/2022; Michael Patterson served on 2/7/2022, answer due 2/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Swan, Andrew)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2021 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/ 7/2022. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Magistrate Judge Wang, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiffs counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/7/2022. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
February 7, 2022 Filing 6 DISREGARD - Duplicate Entry. See ECF No. #5 . NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Andrew Edward Swan on behalf of Shalone Ardrey (Swan, Andrew) Modified on 2/8/2022 to note duplicate entry(trvo, ).
February 7, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Andrew Edward Swan on behalf of Shalone Ardrey (Swan, Andrew)
February 4, 2022 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-00318-WJM. (athom, )
February 4, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, )
February 4, 2022 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, )
February 4, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against City of Florence, Colorado, Michael Patterson (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8301315)Attorney Andrew Edward Swan added to party Shalone Ardrey(pty:pet), filed by Shalone Ardrey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Upon Patterson, #3 Summons upon City of Florence, #4 Exhibit 1 to Complaint & Jury Demand)(Swan, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ardrey v. City of Florence, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shalone Ardrey
Represented By: Andrew Edward Swan
Represented By: Hannah Elizabeth Herbst
Represented By: Michael Dickson Kuhn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Florence, The
Represented By: Sara Ludke Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Patterson
Represented By: Alice Conway Powers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?