Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Patterson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Javad Valad, Brian Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32865
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATTERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson v. Henderson County Det. et al
as 1:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Tony Michael Patterson
Defendant:
Henderson County Det., Dakota Wolfe, FNU Staggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MICHAEL PATTERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bradley et al v. Timco Logistics Systems, LLC
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bradley, Edgar Crespo, Mohi Fogaha and others
Defendant:
Timco Logistics Systems, LLC
McMillen v. Patterson et al
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Micki McMillen
Defendant:
Michael Patterson, Adam Cook, Dominic Neisler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Christopher Patterson v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 23-15592
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL PATTERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
PATTERSON RYLAND v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06824
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MICHAEL PATTERSON RYLAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
