Hayner v. City and County of Denver et al
| Thomas Hayner |
| City and County of Denver, City of Boulder, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, Lewis T. Babcock, Federal Bureau of Investigation, NBC 9 News and Tenga Inc |
| 1:2022cv01675 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Christine M Arguello |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #11 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 8/18/2022. (sphil, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The amended Complaint #9 and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8. Plaintiff's Motion for/to Clarification by Someone Who is Not a Party to This Complaint, Appointment of Counsel and Extension of Time #8 filed August 7, 2022, is denied as moot. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello on 8/18/2022. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER of Recusal, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 8/12/2022. This case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-1675-KLM (angar, )
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Lewis T. Babcock, City and County of Denver, City of Boulder, County of Boulder, Federal Bureau of Investigation, NBC 9 News, State of Colorado, Tenga Inc, filed by Thomas Hayner.(Hayner, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Figure out what is wanted by Plaintiff Thomas Hayner. (Hayner, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #1 Complaint, #6 Order, #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis,, Order Appointing Counsel, #2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs., #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, 4 Case Assigned to Judge Addressed to Thomas Hayner. (angar, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint. It is ORDERED that Mr. Hayner file, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, an amended complaint as directed in this order. If Mr. Hayner fails to file an amended complaint that complies with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 7/8/2022. (sapod, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting Plaintiff Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. The Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED without prejudice as premature because the case is under initial review, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 7/7/2022. (sapod, )
|
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Thomas Hayner. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). by Plaintiff Thomas Hayner. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lewis T. Babcock, City and County of Denver, City of Boulder, County of Boulder, Federal Bureau of Investigation, NBC 9 News, State of Colorado, Tenga Inc, filed by Thomas Hayner.(norlin, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
