Schultz v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union et al
Peter Schultz |
Pentagon Federal Credit Union and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
1:2022cv01716 |
July 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement as to Defendant Pentagon Federal Credit Union by Plaintiff Peter Schultz (Hippensteel, Jacob) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peter Schultz. Pentagon Federal Credit Union served on 7/22/2022, answer due 8/12/2022. (Hippensteel, Jacob) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Peter Schultz. Equifax Information Services, LLC waiver sent on 7/18/2022, answer due 9/16/2022. (Hippensteel, Jacob) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Pentagon Federal Credit Union (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8546044)Attorney Jacob Wayne Hippensteel added to party Peter Schultz(pty:pla), filed by Peter Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Hippensteel, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.