Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Schultz et al v. American Battery Technology Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01965
Counter Defendant:
Peter Schultz and Sunshine and Rain Asset Management Irrevocable Trust
Counter Claimant:
American Battery Technology Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Action Stock Transfer Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Coffman v. PS Business Parks, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03698
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
PS Business Parks, Inc., Ronald L. Havner, Jr., Maria R. Hawthorne and others
Whitfield v. PS Business Parks, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03337
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
PS Business Parks, Inc., Ronald L Havner, Jr., Stephen W. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Hopkins v. PS Business Parks, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03335
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
PS Business Parks, Inc., Ronald L. Havner, Jr., Stephen W. Wilson and others
Stein v. PS Business Parks, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04330
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
PS Business Parks, Inc., Ronald L. Havner, Jr., Maria R. Hawthorne and others
Schultz v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01484
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rodriguez v. Schultz et al
as 1:2019cv01150
Defendant:
Eric F. Grossman, James Gorman, Jeffrey S. Bodsky and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Victoria Ramirez Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
