Spencer v. Burtlow
| Tracy Spencer and Jahad Ali |
| Burtlow and Philip Weiser |
| 1:2022cv02486 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number COX104885 (angar, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. It is ORDERED that the Prisoners Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant must pay the full $5.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Applicant fails to pay the $5.00 filing fee within the time allowed, the habeas corpus application may be denied and the action dismissed without further notice. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 09/28/2022.(jtorr, )
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 In A Habeas Corpus Action by Petitioner Tracy Spencer. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Tracy Spencer. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tgall, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
