Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Burtlow v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 5:2026cv00051
Plaintiff:
Brock Burtlow
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers
Stetzel (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC) et al
as 1:2026cv00924
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Stetzel
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC), Moses Stancil, Siobhan Burtlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roybal v. Burtlow et al
as 1:2025cv03691
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roybal
Defendant:
Siobhan Burtlow, Joshua Lessar and Jacob Stice
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER FOR Joseph Roybal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stetzel v. Stancil et al
as 1:2025cv03349
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Stetzel
Defendant:
Moses Stancil, Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stetzel v. Stancil, et al
as 25-1223
Plaintiff:
PHILIP E. STETZEL
Defendant:
MOSES ANDRE STANCIL, SIOBHAN BURTLOW, HANNAH FELDHACKER and others
Stetzel v. Stancil, et al
as 25-1222
Plaintiff:
PHILIP E. STETZEL
Defendant:
MOSES ANDRE STANCIL, SIOBHAN BURTLOW, JORDAN HARTLEY and others
Stetzel v. Stancil, et al
as 25-1077
Plaintiff:
PHILIP E. STETZEL
Defendant:
MOSES ANDRE STANCIL, SIOBHAN BURTLOW, JORDAN HARTLEY and others
Stetzel (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2025cv00200
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Stetzel
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Siobhan Burtlow, Edward Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Burtlow, et al
as 24-1496
Defendant:
JOSHUA LESSAR, LT head of mailroom, SIOBHAN BURTLOW, F.C.F. Warden and STEVENS, Sgt. F.C.F. mailroom
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL EUGENE OWENS
Stetzel (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv03404
Defendant:
James Bailey, Amanda Retting, Siobhan Burtlow and others
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Stetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
