Cassidy v. Dillon Companies, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Richard Cassidy
Defendant: Dillon Companies, LLC and Kroger Co., The
Case Number: 1:2023cv01199
Filed: May 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Regina M Rodriguez
Referring Judge: Scott T Varholak
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 7/5/2023. (morti, )
July 5, 2023 Filing 18 MINUTE ENTRY for Scheduling Conference held before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 7/5/2023. Deadline for Notice of Intent to file Dispositive Motions: February 29, 2024. Discovery due by 2/19/2024. FTR: A402. (morti, )
July 5, 2023 Filing 17 STATEMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2) by Plaintiff Richard Cassidy. (McQuinn, Ethan)
June 28, 2023 Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Pratt, Katherine)
June 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER This matter is before the Court upon review of the docket. On May 15, 2023, the Court ordered that, because this matter is proceeding on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, each party shall ensure that the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2) has been filed on or before June 21, 2023. [See #10] Plaintiff has filed no disclosure statement. While Defendants have filed a 7.1(a)(1) corporate disclosure statement, this statement fails to "name--and identify the citizenship of--every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to" Defendants, as required by Rule 7.1(a)(2). [See #2] Accordingly, it is ORDERED that all parties shall file Rule 7.1(a)(2) disclosure statements on or before 6/30/2023. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 6/28/2023. Text Only Entry (stvlc4, )
June 28, 2023 Filing 14 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendants Dillon Companies, LLC, Kroger Co., The. (Pratt, Katherine)
June 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 6/20/2023. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
June 20, 2023 Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #11 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-01199-RMR. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, )
June 20, 2023 Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendants Dillon Companies, LLC, Kroger Co., The All parties do not consent.. (Pratt, Katherine)
May 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING ELECTION CONCERNING CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION FORM AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 15 May 2023. Consent Form due by 6/21/2023. Proposed Scheduling Order due 6/28/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 7/5/2023 11:15 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, )
May 12, 2023 Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (norlin, )
May 12, 2023 Filing 8 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (norlin, )
May 12, 2023 Filing 7 Defendants' ANSWER, Defenses Affirmative Defenses, and Jury Demand to #6 Complaint by Dillon Companies, LLC, Kroger Co., The.(norlin, )
May 12, 2023 Filing 6 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Dillon Companies, LLC, Kroger Co., The, filed by Richard Cassidy.(norlin, )
May 12, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Ethan Andrew McQuinn on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Ethan Andrew McQuinn added to party Richard Cassidy(pty:pla) (McQuinn, Ethan)
May 12, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Chelsie Lauren Smith on behalf of Dillon Companies, LLC, The Kroger CompanyAttorney Chelsie Lauren Smith added to party Dillon Companies, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Chelsie Lauren Smith added to party The Kroger Company(pty:dft) (Smith, Chelsie)
May 12, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Katherine M.L. Pratt on behalf of Dillon Companies, LLC, The Kroger Company (Pratt, Katherine)
May 12, 2023 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Pratt, Katherine)
May 12, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Kroger Company, Dillon Companies, LLC from Jefferson County District, Case Number 2023CV30470. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-9098773), filed by The Kroger Company, Dillon Companies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet USDC Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - Complaint and Jury Demand, #4 Exhibit B - Summons-Dillon Companies, LLC, #5 Exhibit C - Summons to The Kroger Company, #6 Exhibit D - ROS - Dillon Companies, #7 Exhibit E - ROS - The Kroger Co., #8 Exhibit F - District Court Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Exhibit G - Defendants Answer, #10 Exhibit H - Colorado Voter Information, #11 Exhibit I - Dillon - Certificate of Good Standing/Periodic Report, #12 Exhibit J - Dillon's Corporate Disclosure Statement, #13 Exhibit K - Kroger Co. Cert of Good Standing, #14 Exhibit L - State Court Docket Sheet, #15 Exhibit M - Civil Procedure Order, #16 Exhibit N - Notice to Set CMC and Trial)(Pratt, Katherine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cassidy v. Dillon Companies, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Cassidy
Represented By: Ethan Andrew McQuinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dillon Companies, LLC
Represented By: Katherine M.L. Pratt
Represented By: Chelsie Lauren Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroger Co., The
Represented By: Chelsie Lauren Smith
Represented By: Katherine M.L. Pratt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?