Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cassidy v. Dillon Companies, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Richard Cassidy
Defendant:
Dillon Companies, LLC and Kroger Co., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cassidy v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv14754
Plaintiff:
Richard Cassidy
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cassidy v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Carson Richard Cassidy
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Berardi et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2009cv03294
Plaintiff:
Concetta Berardi, Concetta Berardi, Concetta Berardi and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Berardi et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 3:2009cv04974
Plaintiff:
Concetta Berardi, Concetta Berardi, Concetta Berardi and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
King v. Industrial Tractor Company et al
as 3:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Danny King and Danny King
Defendant:
Industrial Tractor Company and Richard Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Cassidy v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2008cv03812
Plaintiff:
Richard Cassidy
Defendant:
City Of New York, Albert Marvelli and John and Jane Doe 1 through10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clements et al v. Pearlman et al
as 8:2007cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clements, Steven Arkin, Huriyet Anaz and others
Defendant:
Louis J. Pearlman, Robert Fischetti, Michael Crudele and others
Trustee:
Soneet R. Kapila and Soneet R. Kapila
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
