Hackborn (PS) v. Parsons et al
| Dean D Hackborn |
| Parsons and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2023cv02180 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Petitioner Dean D Hackborn. (sphil, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 30 August 2023. It is ORDERED that Applicant cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant shall obtain (with the assistance of his case manager or the facility's legal assistant) and utilize the appropriate court-approved form for filing a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action, which is available, along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Dean D Hackborn. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(norlin, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
