Zagal v. Target Corporation
Francisco Bahena Zagal |
Target Corporation |
1:2023cv02289 |
September 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Scott T Varholak |
Nina Y Wang |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Adam Gleason, Esq. by Wesley Lynn Eddington on behalf of Francisco Bahena Zagal (Eddington, Wesley) |
Filing 19 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #17 Notice of Entry of Appearance filed by attorney Wesley Lynn Eddington. Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix a complete address block to all future documents.(Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
Filing 18 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES :re: #17 Notice of Entry of Appearance filed by attorney Adam Gleason. The s/signature did not match the filers name on the account for which the login and password are registered. Attorney Adam Gleason NOT added as Counsel of Record REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - all documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(c) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Adam Gleason, Esq. by Wesley Lynn Eddington on behalf of Francisco Bahena Zagal (Eddington, Wesley) |
|
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Robert E. Blackburn. This case is randomly returned to Judge Nina Y. Wang for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-2289-NYW (angar, ) |
Filing 14 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #13 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-02289-REB. (Text Only Entry) (schap, ) |
Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Francisco Bahena Zagal All parties do not consent.. (Eddington, Wesley) |
Filing 12 STATEMENT Citizenship Disclosure Statement for Defendant Target Corporation by Defendant Target Corporation. (Boutsicaris, Stephanie) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #6 Complaint by Target Corporation.(Chase, John) |
|
Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (efoga, ) |
Filing 8 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Complaint, Summons, and Civil Case Cover Sheet upon Target Corporation on 8/8/2023 (efoga, ) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Target Corporation, filed by Francisco Bahena Zagal.(efoga, ) |
Filing 5 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (efoga, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Stephanie E. Boutsicaris on behalf of Target CorporationAttorney Stephanie E. Boutsicaris added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft) (Boutsicaris, Stephanie) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing of State Court Docket Sheet by Defendant Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - ROA in Adams County)(Chase, John) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Target Stores, a division of Target Corporation for Target Corporation. (Chase, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from Francisco Bahena Zagal v. Target Corporation, Case Number 23cv31116. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-9281709), filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 23.08.07 Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - 23.08.07 Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Colorado Secretary of State, #4 Exhibit D - 23.08.09 AOS - Target, #5 Exhibit E - 23.08.07 Summons, #6 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Chase, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Zagal v. Target Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Francisco Bahena Zagal | |
Represented By: | Wesley Lynn Eddington |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Target Corporation | |
Represented By: | Stephanie E. Boutsicaris |
Represented By: | John Roland Chase |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.