Chan (PS) v. Tatoya et al
Nai Lyi Chan |
Mo Tatoya, Michael Dugo, Punjwanj and Ashliegh |
1:2023cv02314 |
September 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Susan Prose |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 11 Inmate Motion Requesting to File Without Prepayment of Filing, by Petitioner Nai Lyi Chan. (sphil, ) |
Filing 10 LETTER by Petitioner Nai Lyi Chan. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Envelope)(sphil, ) |
Filing 9 Inmate Motion Requesting to File Without Prepayment of Filing, by Petitioner Nai Lyi Chan. (sphil, ) |
Filing 8 LETTER by Petitioner Nai Lyi Chan. (sphil, ) |
Filing 7 DISREGARD FILED IN ERROR Modified on 9/22/2023 to note error (jcharl, ). |
Filing 6 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Nai Lyi Chan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) #2 Exhibit) (jcharl, ). |
Filing 5 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Nai Lyi Chan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jcharl, ) |
|
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
Filing 2 Finding And Order Concerning Inmate Motion Requesting Waiving Prepayment Of Filing/Service Fees by Petitioner Nai Lyi Chan. (tgall, ) |
Filing 1 LETTER by Petitioner Nai Lyi Chan. (tgall, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.