Wren v. McDonough et al
Plaintiff: Edna Wren
Defendant: Denis R. McDonough and US Department of Veterans Affairs
Case Number: 1:2024cv00236
Filed: January 25, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Philip A Brimmer
Referring Judge: Susan Prose
2 Judge: Kathryn A Starnella
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2024 Filing 15 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Edna Wren. Plaintiff consents. (jtorr, )
March 1, 2024 Filing 14 USPS CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT RETURN re: #11 Certificate of Service. (jtorr, )
February 12, 2024 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM regarding #5 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel filed by Edna Wren. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/12/2024. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
February 8, 2024 Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER on behalf of the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado, re: #11 Certificate of Service. (jtorr, )
February 8, 2024 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Employment Discrimination Complaint for Service of Process. (Attachments: #1 USPS Certified Mail Receipt) (jtorr, )
February 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella for all motions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/05/2024. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
February 1, 2024 Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (norlin, )
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE per ECF #7 Case randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer for all further proceedings. Case drawn to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Starnella. Magistrate Judge Susan Prose no longer assigned to case. By Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 2/1/2024. Text Only Entry (norlin, )
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DRAWING CASE The Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. 4) is GRANTED. This case shall be DRAWN to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service shall serve process on any Defendant for whom personal service is required. By Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 2/1/2024.(norlin, )
January 25, 2024 Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (blaws)
January 25, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Edna Wren. (blaws)
January 25, 2024 Filing 4 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form), by Plaintiff Edna Wren. (blaws)
January 25, 2024 Filing 3 Exhibit re EEOC Intake Questionnaire in Support of #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Edna Wren. (Public Text Only Entry for Restricted Document #2 filed 01/25/2024) (blaws)
January 25, 2024 Filing 2 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1: Exhibit by Plaintiff Edna Wren. (blaws)
January 25, 2024 Filing 1 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT against Denis R. McDonough, US Department of Veterans Affairs, filed by Edna Wren. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit re EEOC Decision, #3 Exhibit re EEOC Decision on Reconsideration) (blaws)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wren v. McDonough et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edna Wren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Denis R. McDonough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Department of Veterans Affairs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?