Meriam (PS) v. No Named Defendant
| Amber Meriam |
| No Named Defendant |
| 1:2025cv01310 |
| April 25, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Letter from Amber Meriam (agryan) |
| Filing 19 Pro Se LETTER by Plaintiff Amber Meriam. (sphil, ) |
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER re: #14 Plaintiffs second Request for TRO (ECF No. 14) is denied as moot. This action is closed. Future filings will be stricken. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/2/2025.(sphil, )
|
| Filing 17 Letter from Amber Meriam (agryan) |
| Filing 16 Letter from Amber Meriam (agryan) |
| Filing 15 Exhibits in Support of #14 Request for TRO by Plaintiff Amber Meriam. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 14 Request for TRO by Plaintiff Amber Meriam. (sphil, ) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/8/2025. Plaintiff's filings titled "Response to Order" (ECF No. 10), "Motion to Suppress" (ECF No. 11), and "Request for TRO" (ECF No. 12) are DENIED as moot. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 12 REQUEST for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Amber Meriam. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Suppress by Plaintiff Amber Meriam. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Order by Plaintiff Amber Meriam. (sphil, ) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER denying #8 MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 7/2/2025.(sphil, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Plaintiff Amber Meriam. (sphil, ) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 6/17/2025. Plaintiff's filing titled Permanent Injunction (ECF No. 6) is denied as moot. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Plaintiff Amber Meriam. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 6/5/2025. (sphil, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The "Motion to dismiss"(ECF No. 1) and this action aredismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to cure deficiencies within the time allowed and failed to prosecute.. IFP on appeal is DENIED without prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 6/5/2025. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/28/2025. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Amber Meriam. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document)(echa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Meriam (PS) v. No Named Defendant | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amber Meriam | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: No Named Defendant | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
