Adamson (PS) v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections (CDOC) et al
| Amy A. Adamson and Anthony Adonis Adamson |
| Colorado Dept. of Corrections (CDOC), Andre (Moses) Stancil, Thomas Werlich, Sam Spangler, Tamara Gold, Wayne Salbato, Sarah Cordova, Miramontez, Felicity Ziggarelli, Jason Santistevan, Murphy, Ortiz, Trina Dowd, Coen, Racine, Floyd, Edumenia Alfaro, Sarah Berger, Tameika Pillsbury, Mya Taylor, Andrew Sanville and John Bradburn |
| 1:2026cv01482 |
| April 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Amy A. Adamson in the amount of $ 274.33; Receipt Number 117958; Monthly Payment. (echa, ) |
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. #7 ), filed on April 27, 2026, is granted as follows: Plaintiff shall file on or before June 12, 2026, an amended pleading as directed in the April 13, 2026 Order to File Second Amended Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. 19 ). By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 5/1/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt, )
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension by Plaintiff Amy A. Adamson. (anewt,) |
| Filing 6 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Amy A. Adamson in the amount of $ $75.67; Receipt Number 117738; Initial Payment. (anewt,) |
Filing 5
ORDER to File Amended Prisoner Complaint. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff file, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, an amended Prisoner Complaint that complies with all directives contained in this order. To be clear, Plaintiff must submit a single, fully completed Prisoner Complaint on the court-approved form as one document that contains all claims and allegations. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended Prisoner Complaint that complies with this order within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed in whole or in part without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/13/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915. ORDERED that the Prisoners Motion and Affidavit for Leave to ProceedPursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #3 ) is granted. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/9/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt, )
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff Amy A. Adamson. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Edumenia Alfaro, Sarah Berger, John Bradburn, Coen, Colorado Dept. of Corrections (CDOC), Sarah Cordova, Trina Dowd, Floyd, Tamara Gold, Miramontez, Murphy, Ortiz, Tameika Pillsbury, Racine, Wayne Salbato, Jason Santistevan, Andrew Sanville, Sam Spangler, Andre (Moses) Stancil, Mya Taylor, Thomas Werlich, and Felicity Ziggarelli, filed by Amy A. Adamson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(agarc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.