Cases 1 - 10 of 19,498
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant:
P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heberer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03385
Plaintiff:
Bruce Heberer, Pliny Jackson III, James Roper and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Victor Thomas v. Martynuska, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Defendant:
R.N. MARTYNUSKA, Medical Contractor, FCI Loretto, NORMAN WEIDLICH, Health Care Administrator, FCI Loretto, M.D. KIM SWINDELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Murphy v. The Auto Club Group et al
as 2:2024cv11168
Plaintiff:
Regis Murphy
Defendant:
The Auto Club Group and Unify HR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Henton v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Danielle Henton
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC, Crystal D. Murphy and Michael Peeples
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
