Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Murphy v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv05448
Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products L.P., The Chemours Company, National Foam, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Marshall v. Chandler, City of et al
as 2:2026cv10202
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unknown Reed, Keshaun Maurice Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Danica Erika Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Charmaine Wright v. Truliant Federal Credit Union
as 26-2597
Defendant:
KRYSTAL JOHNSON MURPHY, BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC and TRULIANT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE DIANNA WRIGHT
Murphy v. Merck U.S. Retirement Plan et al
as 6:2026cv02384
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck U.S. Retirement Plan
Plaintiff:
Bryan Murphy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Robert Alexander v. McKala Nitzke, et al
as 26-3261
Defendant:
PATRICK J. MURPHY, Doctor and MCKALA NITZKE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. ALEXANDER
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2026cv00921
Defendant:
Kevin Murphy and City of Montgomery
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al (MAG+)
as 2:2026cv00922
Defendant:
Kevin Murphy and City of Montgomery
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2026cv00917
Defendant:
Kevin Murphy and City of Montgomery
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01503
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
