Jones (PS) v. No Named Defendant
| Ray Charles Jones and Ray Jones |
| No Named Defendant |
| 1:2026cv04043 |
| August 28, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. To be clear, in order to cure deficiencies, Plaintiff must submit a completed Prisoner Complaint and a completed Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 on the court-approved forms, with all required supporting documentation. These are the only appropriate filings at this time. Entered by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 8/31/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 1 Letter against No Named Defendant, filed by Ray Charles Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dhern, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
