Lamoureux, et al v. Genesis Pharmacy Svc, et al
| Gary A. Lamoureux, Richard A. Terwilliger, World Wide Medical Tech, LLC, Advanced Care Medical Inc, Advanced Care Pharmacy Inc, Advanced Care Pharmacy LLC and Ideamatrix Inc |
| Anazaohealth Corp |
| Genesis Pharmacy Svc, Inc and Anazaohealth Corp |
| Gary A. Lamoureux, Richard A. Terwilliger, World Wide Medical Tech, LLC, Advanced Care Medical Inc, Advanced Care Pharmacy Inc, Advanced Care Pharmacy LLC and Ideamatrix Inc |
| C. R. Bard, Inc. and CarePak, LLC |
| 3:2003cv01382 |
| January 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| William I. Garfinkel |
| Patent |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
554
ORDER denying 546 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 3/20/2013. (Smith, M.)
|
|
Filing
533
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 475 Motion to Strike ; granting in part and denying in part 504 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 11/18/2010. (Smith, M.)
|
|
Filing
528
ORDER granting 525 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Corrected Declarations to the following extent: the declaration of Jordi is hereby deemed filed. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file within 10 days of the date of this ruling amended declarat ions of Lamoureux and Sanchez referencing the correct affidavits. No further motions to strike need to be filed addressed to these amended affidavits. The Court will consider the pending motions to strike [475 & 504] as soon as the amended declarations of Lamoureux and Sanchez are filed or after 10 days, if amended declarations are not filed. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 09/22/2010. (Smith, M.)
|
|
Filing
431
ORDER granting 427 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration and amending the Court's Claim Construction Ruling 426 in accordance with the attached ruling on reconsideration. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 01/22/2010. (Smith, M.)
|
|
Filing
426
ORDER: The Court hereby issues the attached Claim Construction Opinion, pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 1995), affd, 517 U.S. 370 (1996), construing the disputed claim terms at issue. The parties having consented to the proceed before this Magistrate Judge for all purposes, this is not a recommended ruling. See 28 USC sec. 636(c)(1). SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 11/05/09. (Smith, M.)
|
|
Filing
409
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS: For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the Court finds as moot 377 Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to produce an expert report of James Matons; denies 377 Defendant's Motion to Preclude James Matons from testifying as an expert witness but grants Defendant an additional 30 days from the date of this ruling to depose him and/or to designate a rebuttal expert; grants 379 Defendant's Motion to Preclude Gary Lamoureux from testifying as an expert witness on damages, but denies Defendant's motion to preclude him from testifying as an expert witness on infringement issues; and finds as moot 379 Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to produce an expert report of Gary Lamoureux. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 04/30/2009. (Smith, M.)
|
|
Filing
398
ORDER granting 321 the Terwilliger Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order; granting 322 the World Wide Plaintiffs' Motion for Joinder in the Motion for Protective Order; denying 346 Defendant's Cross-Motion to Compel; denying [3 46] Defendant's Cross-Motion for Sanctions; denying 346 Defendant's Cross-Motion for Contempt; granting 361 Motion for W. Scott Newbern to Appear as counsel of record for Plaintiffs Gary A. Lamoureux, World Wide Medical Technologies, LL C, Advanced Care Medical, Inc., Advanced Care Pharmacy, Inc., and Advanced Care Pharmacy LLC; denying 363 Defendant's Motion to Vacate ; granting 363 Defendant's Motion, in the Alternative, for Modification of the Protective Order to pr ohibit disclosure of "Confidential" information produced by Defendant to Attorney Newbern; granting in part and denying in part 376 Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees and costs; denying 376 Defendant's Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 389 the World Wide Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 3/26/2009. (Smith, M.)
|
|
Filing
370
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the Court GRANTS Defendant's 340 Motion for Protective Order and designates the damages analysis, Tab A, as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of the Protective Order and orders counsel to com ply with that Order in terms of the dissemination of this information. To the extent that this information has been disseminated to anyone in violation of that Protective Order, Plaintiffs counsel should immediately advise defense counsel to whom it has been disseminated, retrieve that information, and take steps to ensure that the persons to whom it has been disseminated protect its confidentiality. Defendants request for an award of reasonable costs and attorneys fees in bringing this motion is also GRANTED. Defense counsel shall submit to the Court a fee affidavit within ten (10) days of the date of this ruling. Plaintiffs shall have seven (7) days to file opposition, if any, to the fees and costs requested. No further briefing of the issue will be allowed. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 2/19/2009. (Smith, M.)
|
|
Filing
344
ORDER taking under advisement 340 Defendant's Emergency Motion for Protective Order. The Court is unable to rule on the merits of the motion based upon the information presented. In accordance with the attached ruling, the parties are direct ed to submit supplemental supporting exhibits and/or sworn affidavits on or before January 29, 2009. Plaintiffs are to maintain the confidentiality of "Tab A" until further ruling from the Court and to advise all World Wide principals and damages experts, or anyone else to whom this information has been disclosed, to do likewise. If nothing is filed by either side by January 29, 2009, the Court will enter an order denying the motion. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/21/2009. (Smith, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
