Northeast Utilities Svc Co et al v. Travelers Excess Surplus Co et al
| Northeast Utilities Svc Co and Connecticut Light & Power Co |
| Travelers Excess Surplus Co and St Paul Travelers Ins Co |
| 3:2008cv01673 |
| November 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Insurance Office |
| Hartford |
| Charles S. Haight, Jr. |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
RULING denying 79 Motion to Alter Judgment. The Motion is denied because there are no relevant findings to alter. Nevertheless, as explained in the attached Ruling, the Court takes this opportunity to clarify the Ruling of July 12, 2012 [Doc. 77] . The July 12, 2012 Ruling does not contain any holding or finding about the scope of AET's obligations under the referenced contract or the degree of its compliance with those obligations. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on December 18, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
|
Filing
77
RULING denying 39 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 45 defendant Utica Mutual Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 49 defendant St. Paul Fire & Marine Company's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff dismissing the Complaint, and to close the case. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on July 12, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
