Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Flowers v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
as 21-860
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Patricia A. Flowers
Defendant / Appellee:
Connecticut Light & Power Co., AKA Northeast Utilities, AKA Eversource Energy
Flowers v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
as 3:2020cv01016
Defendant:
Connecticut Light & Power Co., Northeast Utilities and Eversource Energy
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. 43.47 Acres Of Land, Litchfiel
as 13-4756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Schaghticoke Tribal Nation, FKA Schaghticoke Tribe Of Indians
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
43.47 Acres Of Land, Litchfield County, New Milford Savings Bank, Frank H. Turkington and others
Intervenor:
Schaghticoke Indian Tribe
Fields v. Connecticut Light & Power Co
as 3:2008cv01709
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fields
Defendant:
Connecticut Light & Power Co
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Northeast Utilities Svc Co et al v. Travelers Excess Surplus Co et al
as 3:2008cv01673
Plaintiff:
Northeast Utilities Svc Co and Connecticut Light & Power Co
Defendant:
Travelers Excess Surplus Co and St Paul Travelers Ins Co
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Barnett v Carberry, et al
as 3:2008cv00714
Plaintiff:
Judy Prescott Barnett and Judy Prescott Barnett
Defendant:
Robert E. Carberry, Robert E. Carberry, S. Derek Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schiavone et al v. Northeast Utilities Svc Co et al
as 3:2008cv00429
Plaintiff:
Michael Schiavone and Harbor Circle LLC
Defendant:
Northeast Utilities Svc Co and Connecticut Light & Power Co
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Connecticut Light & Power Co v. International Bro of Elec Workers, Local 457
as 3:2007cv00863
Plaintiff:
Connecticut Light & Power Co
Defendant:
International Bro of Elec Workers, Local 457
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
