Giardina v. Astrue

Giardina v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Vincent Joseph Giardina
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	3:2010cv01511
Filed:	September 22, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	New Haven
Presiding Judge:	William I. Garfinkel
Presiding Judge:	Stefan R. Underhill
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 23, 2011	Filing 28 ORDER granting 25 Defendant's Assented to Motion for Judgment and Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 USC sec. 405(g) and granting to the extent consistent with this Order 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner.T he Clerk is directed to enter a separate judgment in favor of Plaintiff in this matter under Rule 58(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., to remand this cause to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings in accordance with this Order, and to close this case. This is not a Recommended Ruling. The parties have consented to the Magistrate Judges entering a final order in this case without the need for entry of a recommended ruling and review by a District Judge. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b). Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 11/23/2011. (Smith, M.)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 23, 2011

Filing 28 ORDER granting 25 Defendant's Assented to Motion for Judgment and Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 USC sec. 405(g) and granting to the extent consistent with this Order 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner.T he Clerk is directed to enter a separate judgment in favor of Plaintiff in this matter under Rule 58(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., to remand this cause to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings in accordance with this Order, and to close this case. This is not a Recommended Ruling. The parties have consented to the Magistrate Judges entering a final order in this case without the need for entry of a recommended ruling and review by a District Judge. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b). Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 11/23/2011. (Smith, M.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Giardina v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vincent Joseph Giardina
Represented By:	Betty G. Levy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?