Girouard v. Astrue

Girouard v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Tina Girouard
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	3:2010cv01784
Filed:	November 12, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	New Haven
Presiding Judge:	Stefan R. Underhill
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 30, 2011	Filing 30 ORDER: As set forth in the attached Ruling, the Court hereby GRANTS 28 the Defendant's Assented to Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with Reversal and Remand of the Cause to the Defendant. Plaintiff&# 039;s Motion to Reverse and/or Remand the Decision of the Commissioner 21 is GRANTED to the extent set forth in this Order.This is not a Recommended Ruling. The parties have consented to the Magistrate Judge's entering a final order in this c ase without the need for entry of a recommended ruling and review by a District Judge. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b). The Clerk is directed to enter a separate judgment in favor of Plaintiff in this matter under Rule 58(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., to remand this cause to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings in accordance with this Order, and to close this case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 11/30/2011. (Smith, M.)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 30, 2011

Filing 30 ORDER: As set forth in the attached Ruling, the Court hereby GRANTS 28 the Defendant's Assented to Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with Reversal and Remand of the Cause to the Defendant. Plaintiff&# 039;s Motion to Reverse and/or Remand the Decision of the Commissioner 21 is GRANTED to the extent set forth in this Order.This is not a Recommended Ruling. The parties have consented to the Magistrate Judge's entering a final order in this c ase without the need for entry of a recommended ruling and review by a District Judge. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b). The Clerk is directed to enter a separate judgment in favor of Plaintiff in this matter under Rule 58(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., to remand this cause to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings in accordance with this Order, and to close this case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 11/30/2011. (Smith, M.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Girouard v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Girouard
Represented By:	Charles A. Pirro, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?