Diaz v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Diana Diaz
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2011cv00317
Filed: February 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L. Bryant
Presiding Judge: Thomas P. Smith
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER denying 18 Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner; granting 18 Motion to Remand to Agency; denying 23 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner; and adopting 25 Recommended Ruling. See attached memorandum of decision. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on September 5, 2012. (Butler, Ayanna)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diaz v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Diaz
Represented By: Charles A. Pirro, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Brenda M. Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?