Umpierre v. Astrue

Umpierre v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Amador Umpierre
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	3:2011cv00917
Filed:	June 7, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	Fairfield
Presiding Judge:	Peter C. Dorsey
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of SSA Decision DIWC - Title II Worker or Child Claims
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 4, 2013	Filing 23 ORDER. The defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) With Reversal and Remand of the Cause to the Commissioner 21 is granted. Upon the consent of the parties, this Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner in accordance with the defendant's motion. Both parties have consented to the Magistrate Judge entering a final order i n this case and agree that there is no need for review by a district judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Consent Form, attached. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) remanding this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, and to close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Smith on February 4, 2013. (Pylman, Jacob)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 4, 2013

Filing 23 ORDER. The defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) With Reversal and Remand of the Cause to the Commissioner 21 is granted. Upon the consent of the parties, this Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner in accordance with the defendant's motion. Both parties have consented to the Magistrate Judge entering a final order i n this case and agree that there is no need for review by a district judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Consent Form, attached. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) remanding this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, and to close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Smith on February 4, 2013. (Pylman, Jacob)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Umpierre v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amador Umpierre
Represented By:	Charles A. Pirro, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?