Van Arsdale v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Michelle Leigh Van Arsdale
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2011cv01014
Filed: June 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Peter C. Dorsey
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Defendant's Motion to Reverse and Remand. See attached opinion. As both parties have consented to the Magistrate Judge entering a final order in this case, there is no need for review by a district judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The Clerk is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Smith on July 24, 2012. (Slitt, M.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Van Arsdale v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Leigh Van Arsdale
Represented By: Betty G. Levy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?