Halmers v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Kimberly Marie Halmers
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2012cv00288
Filed: February 29, 2012
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: William I. Garfinkel
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 26, 2013 19 Opinion or Order of the Court For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS 15 Commissioner's Motion for an Order Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner and DENIES 11 Ms. Halmers's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/26/2013. (Pomeroy, K.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Halmers v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Marie Halmers
Represented By: Charles E. Binder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?