Gonzalez v. Waterbury Police Dept et al
| Gabriel Gonzalez |
| Waterbury Police Dept, Richard Hamel, Jason Lanore, Max Torres, Robert Liquindoli, Waterbury, Ct., City Of, James Dickey, Eduardo Rivera and Tim Jackson |
| 3:2012cv00478 |
| March 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
AMENDED ORDER re 187 Order on Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/9/2016. (Landman, M)
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 171 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. The case will be re-tried on all claims against all defendants, except that one of the claims (rock-throwing) is dismissed against Timothy Jackson. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/29/2016. (Landman, M)
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER re 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Waterbury Police Dept, Robert Liquindoli, Jason Lanoie, Eduardo Rivera, Waterbury, Ct., City Of, Tim Jamseson, James Dickey, Tim Jackson, Max Torres, Richard Hamel, 99 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. The City of Waterbury is dismissed from the case. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/11/2016. (Landman, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
